JOGESH CHANDRA @ YOGESH CHANDRA VERMA v. PANNA LAL AND 13 OTHERS
A227/11346/2025 · 2025-09-18
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98066 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98066 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11346 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"I. To direct the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) East Prayagraj to decide Case No. 3312 of 2024 (Jogesh Chandra @ Yogesh Chandra Verma Versus Panna Lal and others), within stipulated period of 03 month, otherwise the Plaintiff/Applicant may suffer irreparable loss and injury. II To direct the learned court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) East Prayagraj to decide 6C application dated 27.11.2024 for Permanent Injunction filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner within stipulated period of 01 month, otherwise the Plaintiff/Applicant may suffer irreparable loss and injury."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid suit is pending since 2024. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Prayer made in the writ petition can not be granted to the petitioner in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali Isteba; 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB).
5. It has been further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Tripathi, Praveen Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Jogesh Chandra @ Yogesh Chandra Verma .....Petitioner(s) Panna Lal And 13 Others .....Respondent(s)
application for interim injunction (paper No. 6C) is pending consideration.
6. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) East Prayagraj to consider and decide the interim injunction application (paper No. 6C) of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 19, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11346 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad