HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32973 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Anurag Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Avadhesh Narayan Dubey, learned counsel for respondent no.2, Development Authority. 2. The instant writ petition is preferred for the following relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing Meerut Development Authority to provide amenities which includes roads, water supply, street lighting, drainage, sewerage and maintained park of Gangapuram Colony, Rajpura, Meerut as per sanctioned Layout dated 28.12.2004 and ensure compliance of the order dated 18.01.2025 passed by Vice-Chairman, Meerut Development Authority. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Meerut Development Authority to provide amenities which includes roads, water supply, street lighting, drainage, sewerage and maintained park of Gangapuram Colony, Rajpura, Meerut from its own resources." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners who are residents of Gangapuram Colony, Rajpura, Meerut had earlier approached to this Court with the similar complaint by filing a writ petition, which Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avadhesh Narayan Dubey, C.S.C., Shiv Prakash Gupta Gangapuram Social Welfare Society And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) was registered as Writ - C No. 35140 of 2024 (Gangapuram Social Welfare Society and another vs. State of U.P. and another) wherein the Court has given a direction to the Meerut Development Authority (MDA) to decide the claim of the petitioners within a period of three months for the date of filing of the fresh representation. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents raised a preliminary objection qua the maintainability of the writ petition on the premise that the dispute is inter se between the Development Authority and the petitioner- Welfare Society. 5. It is also informed that in response to the earlier Court order dated 04.04.2018 passed in Writ C No. 12296 of 2018 (Ishwar Pal and others vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) wherein a direction was issued to appoint an Arbitrator and later on the District Magistrate, Meerut who was appointed as an arbitrator in the said proceeding had passed an award dated 06.02.2024 and accordingly the notice was also issued. Consequently a civil suit was preferred being Original Suit No. 57 of 2024 wherein the status quo order has also been maintained. 6. Considering the factual situation, we are not inclined to accord any relief to the petitioner and it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent authority and file appropriate application in the said proceeding. 7. The writ petition stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 Ashish Pd. WRIC No. 32973 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad