HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11381 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " A. Issue an appropriate order or direction commanding the learned Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Chadauli to consider and decide the Application 6-C (for Temporary Injunction) filed in Original Suit No. 185/2025 (Amit Tiwari and another vs. Neelam Chauhan and others) within a period as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Chadauli to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rudra Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Neelam Chauhan And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 19, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 11381 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad