HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32247 of 2025 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J. 1-Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State and Ms. Kiran Rani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. 2-The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 159 of 2025, under Section 85, 80(2) B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Brijmanganj, District-Maharajganj during the pendency of trial. 3-As per the prosecution case in brief, complainant Gudiya, who is mother of the deceased-Surati got a first information report lodged on 03.06.2025 against Vijay, Ajay Chauhan, Parshuram (applicant), Gayatri Devi and Rukmani, who are husband, brother-in-law, father- in-law (applicant), mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased respectively stating inter-alia that the marriage of her daughter was solemnized one year back with the son of the present applicant but subsequently, her daughter was being harassed in her matrimonial home and she was done to death by the aforesaid accused persons. 4-The main substratum of argument of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is father-in-law of the deceased and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The case of the applicant stands on similar footing to that of co-accused Gayatri Devi, who is mother-in-law of the deceased and has been granted bail by the co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.08.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 28730 of 2025, therefore, the applicant who is languishing in jail since 06.06.2025 is also entitled to be released Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mishra Vikas Kumar Prabhunath, Prashant Ji Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Parshuram Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) on bail on the ground of parity. 5-Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. 6-Having heard learned counsel for the parties and examined the matter in its entirety, I find that co-accused Gayatri Devi, under similar accusation, has been granted bail as noted above. 7-Accordingly, the instant bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. 8-Let the applicant-Parshuram Chauhan, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) That the applicant shall cooperate in the expeditious disposal of the trial and shall regularly attend the court unless inevitable. (ii) That the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) That after his release, the applicant shall not involve in any criminal activity. (iv) The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned before the release of the applicant on bail. 9-In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant. September 19, 2025 Saurabh BAIL No. 32247 of 2025 2 (Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad