Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9803 (RAJ)

RAJNI RAJPUT D/O SHRI OMPRAKASAH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1976/2021 · 2025-09-03

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35240] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1976/2021 1. Rajni Rajput D/o Shri Omprakasah, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Madrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Vijendra Nayak S/o Shri Hansraj Nayak, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Tindu, Tehsil Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General of Police, Rajasthan (Raj). 3. The Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (Raj). 4. The SHO, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur. 5. Omprakash S/o Jagannath, R/o Madrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj). 6. Gurucharan S/o Unknown, R/o Police Line, Chandpole, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. with Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 03/09/2025 1. Today, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners. On last occasion i.e. 20.04.2021 also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 2. The miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners for getting protection from private respondent Nos. 5 and 6. 3. The present petition is pending for almost last 4 years. [2025:RJ-JP:35240] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1976/2021] 4. From the perusal of the record, it is admitted fact that the petitioners have solemnized their marriage and are living their married life peacefully since 2021. However, their married life is not agreeable to respondent Nos. 5 and 6. 5. In view of the aforesaid, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /56