MOHAMMAD AASIF AND 12 OTHERS v. ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/14177/2025 · 2025-09-18
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98026 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98026 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14177 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no.1, 2 and 3 to take appropriate decision in regard to grant of grade pay of Rs. 2800 and Pay matrix level-5 within stipulated time if necessary after communication and consultation with UGC. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents directing the respondent no.1 an appropriate decision on representation dated 4.8.2025 pending consideration before it. "
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that petitioners may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4, Sri Abrar Ahmad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Dhar Dwivedi, Shiv Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Abrar Ahmad, Pratik Chandra, Shashank Shekhar Singh Mohammad Aasif And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) Aligarh Muslim University And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners as no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioners are
directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 Vice Chancellor, A.M.U. (Administration Section) within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is
disposed of. September 19, 2025 AKT WRIA No. 14177 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad