HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2978/2025 M/s Chief Autolines …..Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Mandeep Reen, Advocate. Vs Union of India & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (29.10.2025) 01. The instant writ petition suffers from deficiency of essential particulars, on the basis of which the allegation of personal bias against respondent No. 3, who is a high-ranking Army official, cannot be heard to be maintained without particulars attending the writ petition. 02. Accordingly, when pointed out to learned counsel for the petitioner, she seeks withdrawal of the instant writ petition with liberty reserved to come up with the better writ petition. 03. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty given. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 29.10.2025 Shivalee Serial No. 106 Shivalee Khajuria 2025.11.03 15:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document