Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9801 (RAJ)

SANTOSH MEENA W/O AMARCHAND MEENA v. SMT. LAXMI DEVI W/O LATE SHRI RAM KRAPAL YADAV

WRW/75/2025 · 2025-04-03

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14966] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 75/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17406/2023 Santosh Meena W/o Amarchand Meena, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Semla, Tehsil Laxmangarh District Alwar Rajasthan, Presently J-77, Paryavaran Complex, Ignu Road, New Delhi- 110068 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Laxmi Devi W/o Late Shri Ram Krapal Yadav, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Plot No.b-255, Ramkrapal Nagar, Chor Dungri, Jaipur Road, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar Rajasthan Through Power Of Attorney Shri Rajeev Yadav S/o Late Shri Ramkrapal Yadav Aged 53 Years, R/o Plot No.h-255, Ramkrapal Nagar, Choor Dongri, Jaipur Road, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar, Rajasthan 2. Urban Improvement Trust Alwar, Through Secretary, Officer Of Urban Improvement Trust Alwar, Bhagat Singh Ka Choraha, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar Rajasthan 3. Urban Improvement Trust, Through Chairman Office Urban Improvement Trust, Alwar, Bhagat Singh Ka Choraha, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. K. Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mohit Gupta, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 03/04/2025 Heard. [2025:RJ-JP:14966] (2 of 2) [WRW-75/2025] There is no error apparent on the face of the record, so as to review the order dated 10.02.2025 moreso, when the scope of review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is very limited. The Review Petition stands dismissed accordingly. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin /01