Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.824 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.02.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.824 of 2025 Deepa ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore – 641 018.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Law & Order, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore – 641 018.
3. The Inspector of Police, D-2 Police Station, Selvapuram, Coimbatore – 641 026.
4. Eswari
5. Renuka
6. G.Rani
7. K.Sargunan
8. Jayaraman ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1 to 3 respondents to provide police protection to petitioner and also for the peaceful enjoyment of petitioner property situated at ward No.43AQ, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.824 of 2025 Kumarapalayam, Block No.1, TSLR No.2/2, Old Survey No.594/1B, to an extent of 36 cents of vacant land on the basis of petitioner representation cum complaint dated 16.12.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh For Respondents For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1 to 3, to provide police protection to petitioner and also for the peaceful enjoyment of petitioner property situated at ward No.43AQ, Kumarapalayam, Block No.1, TSLR No.2/2, Old Survey No.594/1B, to an extent of 36 cents of vacant land, on the basis of petitioner's representation cum complaint dated 16.12.2024.
2. On instruction, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents police submitted that on receipt of the complaint, they issued summon to the petitioner. However, the petitioner failed to appear before them for enquriy. Therefore, the complaint lodged by the petitioner was closed.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.824 of 2025 that the petitioner was never served with any summon for enquiry.
4. Considering the above facts and circumstances, the third respondent is directed to issue fresh notice to the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 8, for enquiry and after giving an opportunity of hearing to them, pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 17.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order rts https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.824 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, rts To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore – 641 018.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Law & Order, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore – 641 018.
3. The Inspector of Police, D-2 Police Station, Selvapuram, Coimbatore – 641 026.
4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. W.P.No.824 of 2025 17.02.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis