Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11153 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"I.Issue an order or direction to the court Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar Jaunpur to decide the 6C Application in suit No. 1644 of 2023 (Vijay Shankar Vs. Khairunnisha ) within stipulated period."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Verma, Kamala Shanker Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Vijay Shankar .....Petitioner(s) Khairunnisha .....Respondent(s)
expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
September 17, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 11153 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad