SUPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9604/2025 · 2025-09-03
Jasjit Singh Bedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97963 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97963 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-9604-2025 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRWP-9604-2025 Date of Decision:-03.09.2025 Supreet Kaur & Anr. ......Petitioners. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors. ......Respondents.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Rajiv Rathor, Advocate for Mr. Adarshdeep Singh, Advocate for the Petitioners. *** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the first marriage between the petitioners. The petitioners have prayed for the issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents for protecting their civil/personal rights and liberties from being violated by the private respondents. The petitioners are alleged to have solemnized marriage on 01.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) on attaining the age of majority. They feel reasonable apprehension and a threat perception at the hands of the private respondents and pray that their personal/civil rights be not violated by them. Precisely, in the context of the aforesaid relief, the petitioners have approached the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala- respondent no.2 by way of a representations dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P- 5).
VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.09.03 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-9604-2025 #2# Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State of Punjab. At this stage, without expressing any opinion as to the validity of the marriage and majority of the petitioners, it would be just and appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order on merits in accordance with law. Respondent No.2 would pass necessary order without being influenced by any pleadings made in the petition. It would be appreciated if the needful is done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this order shall not debar the official respondents from proceeding against any of the parties, if they are involved in any other case. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI ) JUDGE September 03, 2025 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.09.03 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document