Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97959 (ALL)

MITHILESH SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22952/2025 · 2025-10-08

Ajay Kumar Ii, Rajeev Misra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22952 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Heard Mr. Narendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate Holding Brief of Mr. Ravikant Shukla, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate, representing State respondents 1 and 2. 2. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner has approached this Court by means of the present writ petition with the following relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the Impugned order dated Additional Police 22.08.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Commissionorate, Prayagraj in Case No.0337 of 2025 (State Vs. Mithilesh Shukla) u/s-3(1) of U.P. Control Gundas Act, Police Station-Phoolpur, District-Prayagraj (Annexure No.6), so for as it relates to the present case to the petitioner. II. and directing the Issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus Commanding respondent nos.2 & 3 not to take any action against the petitioner in impugned order dated 22.08.2025 is Case No. 0337 of 2025, Under Section 3(1) U.P. Control Gundas Act, 1970 at Police Station-Phoolpur, District-Prayagraj. III. Issue any other or further order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit & proper under the facts and circumstances of the case; Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravikant Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mithilesh Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) IV. Award cost of the writ petition to the petitioner." 4. After some argument, the learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition to approach the Appellate Authority under the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for State respondents has no objection to the prayer made by the learned Counsel for petitioner. 6. In view of above, this writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. October 9, 2025 Prashant D. CRLP No. 22952 of 2025 2 (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad