CRM-M-49525 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 126 BALDEV RAJ KHULLAR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions who had forcefully thrown the petitioner and his wife out of the premises. 2. petitioner No.2. The l decide the abovementioned representation 3. 49525-2025 (O&M)8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH BALDEV RAJ KHULLAR VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Ms. Meena Bansal, Advocate SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the police to register FIR against the respondents No.5 to 8, who had forcefully thrown the petitioner and his wife the premises. The learned counsel representing the petitioner petitioner has filed representation (Annexure P The learned counsel prays for directions to e abovementioned representation Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-49525-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 05.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner against the respondents No.5 to 8, who had forcefully thrown the petitioner and his wife, and their belongings earned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-6) before the respondent earned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to e abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. respondents No.1 to 4 only. (O&M) .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for against the respondents No.5 to 8, and their belongings, submits that the respondent the respondent No.2 to GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.05 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-49525 5. deciding the respondent 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to representation has been made by the petitioner, decide the representation one month authority of District Ludhiana shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment the issue of providing security to no observation of this Court with regard to merits of the case and the police authorities shall be at libert influenced by the contents of instant order. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 49525-2025 (O&M)8587 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for deciding the representation (Annexure P- respondent No.2 and that the instant petition be disposed of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the representation has been made by the petitioner, decide the representation of the petitioner one month from the date of receipt of copy of instant order authority of District Ludhiana shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioner the issue of providing security to him. However, it is made clear that there is no observation of this Court with regard to merits of the case and the police authorities shall be at liberty to draw their own conclusion without being influenced by the contents of instant order. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for -6) of the petitioner be given to the instant petition be disposed of accordingly. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is the respondent No.2, to whom the representation has been made by the petitioner, to pass a speaking order and of the petitioner (Annexure P-6) within a period of the date of receipt of copy of instant order. The police authority of District Ludhiana shall be at liberty to make an independent at perception to the petitioner, and take a decision on . However, it is made clear that there is no observation of this Court with regard to merits of the case and the police y to draw their own conclusion without being influenced by the contents of instant order. :Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is , to whom the a speaking order and ) within a period of The police authority of District Ludhiana shall be at liberty to make an independent , and take a decision on . However, it is made clear that there is no observation of this Court with regard to merits of the case and the police y to draw their own conclusion without being GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.05 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document