Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97934 (PAT)

Md. Anwar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./63638/2025 · 2025-09-23

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63638 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Anwar S/o Sheikh Mahiruddin @ Sheikh Mahruddin Resident of vill- Parasmani, P.S- Sarsi, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the State : Ms.Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 23-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 355 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of 407 liters of illicit foreign liquor. 4. The petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2025 and he claims to have clean antecedent. 5. Considering the quantum of recovery, this application is allowed. 6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63638 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge (Excise-01), Purnea /concerned Court below in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 355 of 2025. 7. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Sarsi Police Station on every Sunday of the month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. 8. As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other case then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted. P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T