IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2146 of 2017 ====================================================== Mahendra Prasad S/o Late Ramdeo Mahto, resident of Village- Bihargai, P.O.- Chaugain, Anchal- Banke Bazar, P.S.- Roshanganj, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Member Administration Bihar, Land Tribunal, Patna. 3. The Joint Director, Consolidation, Magadh Division, Gaya. 4. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5. The Consolidation Officer, Amas, Gaya. 6. Angrah Prasad, S/o Late Ramdeo Mahto, 7. Rajendra Prasad, S/o Late Ramdeo Mahto, Both resident of Village- Bihariganj, P.O.- Chaugain, Anchal- Banke Bazar, P.S.- Roshanganj, District- Gaya. 8. Bimla Chakhaiyar, W/o Ramesh Chakhiyar, 9. Dibya Chakaiyar, D/o Ramesh Chakaiyar, W/o Dr. S.R. Karan, Both 8 and 9 resident of Village- Bihariganj, P.O.- Chaugain, Anchal- Banke Bazar, P.S.- Roshanganj, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 25-11-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner as also the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) For issuance of an appropriate order/s, direction/s including a writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing the order dated 27-11- 2016 passed n B.L.T. Case No. 137 of 2015 passed Patna High Court CWJC No.2146 of 2017(2) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 by respondent No. 02 whereby and where under he has allowed the B.L.T. Case No. 137/2015 in favour of the petitioner and set-aside the order dated 29-11-1997 passed by learned Joint Director, Consolidation, Gaya in Revision Case No. 2/97 without hearing the petitioner. (ii) To direct the respondent No. 2 to hear the petitioner afresh in accordance with provision of law giving him opportunity to raise his all the question of law and facts regarding his genuine claim. (iii) For any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioners are found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. For want of prosecution, dismissed. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U