P a g e | 1 Items No. 1-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(Review.Pet.) No. 8 of 2019 Ph. Chandrajini Devi and 4 Others …Applicants - Versus - State of Manipur and 8 Others …Respondents With Review. Pet. No. 9 of 2019 B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR O R D E R 11.04.2025 Ms. I. Bimola, learned counsel, appears for the applicants and Mr. Juno Rahman, learned counsel, appears for the respondents. Learned counsel appearing for the both parties submits that the condone delay application filed by the applicants has become infructuous since the tenure of the Governing Body is expired. In the light of the above, MC(Review.Pet.) No. 8 of 2019 is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Review. Pet. No. 9 of 2019 is also dismissed as infructuous. CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2025.04.15 14:35:23 +05'30'