MIDATHAPATI APPARAO AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU
Bail App/96/2025 · 2026-05-22
Sanjay Dhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 979 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 979 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 5 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)
Case: Bail App No. 96/2025 c/w CRM(M) No. 580/2025
Midathapati Apparao and another …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Shariq J Reyaz, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K ... Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Dar, GA
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 22.05.2026
Bail App No. 96/2025
01. The applicants in the aforesaid bail application have been granted interim anticipatory bail in terms of order dated 15.04.2026 and is still in force.
02. Status report/reply has not been filed by the respondent and nothing has been brought to the notice of this Court to show that applicants have misused the concession of the interim bail granted to them.
03. In this view of the matter, the interim bail granted to the applicants in terms of order dated 15.04.2026, is made absolute subject to the conditions contained in the said order.
04. The application stand disposed of.
CRM(M) No. 580/2025
List on 10.07.2026.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE Jammu 22.05.2026 AKHILESH