SARITA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/32765/2025 · 2025-09-17
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32765 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful married life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel has submitted that age of petitioner no.2 is below 21 years, meaning thereby, petitioner no.2 is below the marriageable age and as such, petitioners are not entitled to get any relief.
4. In view of the instructions, the present petition stands dismissed. September 18, 2025 Vivek Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Saxena Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Sarita Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad