Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97885 (ALL)

PREM CHAND v. AVINASH SHUKLA AND 4 OTHERS

A227/11401/2025 · 2025-09-18

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11401 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i. Pass an Order, directing the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), District Jaunpur to decide the Application (Paper No. 6C) in the Original Suit No. 758 of 2025 [Prem Chandra and Others Vs. Avinash and Others] pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), District Jaunpur within a stipulated period of time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court; ii. Pass an Order, directing the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), District Jaunpur to decide the Original Suit No. 758 of 2025 [Prem Chandra and Others Vs. Avinash and Others] pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), District Jaunpur within a stipulated period of time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court;" 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), District Jaunpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Prem Chand .....Petitioner(s) Avinash Shukla And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 19, 2025 S. Singh A227 No. 11401 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad