Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97883 (ALL)

MAHMUD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/33070/2025 · 2025-09-18

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33070 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State and perused the record. 2. Petitioner is a complainant and he made a complaint against the sitting Pradhan of the village namely Nazakat Ali as well as Sachin Kumar Daka, Secretary of the Gram Panchayat Badauda Sinhani, Post-Sapnawat, Tehsil- Dhaulana, District Hapur along-with affidavit on 28.06.2024. In the said complaint, enquiry committee was constituted but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter hence present writ petition. 3. On the other hand it is argued by learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-State that the decision will be taken in the matter by the competent authority expeditiously. 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Hapur to take a decision in the matter expeditiously strictly in accordance with law after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned unless there is no legal impediment. September 19, 2025 Pramod Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girijesh Kumar Gupta, Shiv Shankar Pd Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Mahmud .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad