Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97865 (PNJ)

RUPINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/10124/2024 · 2025-07-14

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-10124 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 238 Rupinder Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of necessary direction to respondents No. 1 to 4 to protect his life and liberty at the hands of respondents No. 5 to 11. 2. is submitted therein and learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab has argued that at the instance of the petitioner, an FIR bearing No. 106 dated 28.09.2024, under Sections 329, 324(4), 351, 191(3), 190 and 62 of Bharatiya Nyaya San against respondents No. 5 to 8 and some other unidentified persons. However, after conducting a thorough investigation in the matter, the allegations levelled by the petitioner against private 10124-2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rupinder Singh Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Tuneet Walia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. J. S. Dadwal, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 11. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of necessary direction to respondents No. 1 to 4 to protect his life and liberty at the hands of respondents No. 5 to 11. Upon notice, short reply has been filed by the is submitted therein and learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab has argued that at the instance of the petitioner, an FIR bearing No. 106 dated 28.09.2024, under Sections 329, 324(4), 351, 191(3), 190 and 62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 was registered at Police Station Khilchian, Amritsar against respondents No. 5 to 8 and some other unidentified persons. However, after conducting a thorough investigation in the matter, the allegations levelled by the petitioner against private IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10124-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of necessary direction to respondents No. 1 to 4 to protect his life and liberty at the hands of Upon notice, short reply has been filed by the respondent-State. It is submitted therein and learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab has argued that at the instance of the petitioner, an FIR bearing No. 106 dated 28.09.2024, under Sections 329, 324(4), 351, 191(3), 190 and 62 of Bharatiya hita, 2023 was registered at Police Station Khilchian, Amritsar against respondents No. 5 to 8 and some other unidentified persons. However, after conducting a thorough investigation in the matter, the allegations levelled by the petitioner against private respondents were found to be -1- 2024 (O&M) 14.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of necessary direction to respondents No. 1 to 4 to protect his life and liberty at the hands of State. It is submitted therein and learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab has argued that at the instance of the petitioner, an FIR bearing No. 106 dated 28.09.2024, under Sections 329, 324(4), 351, 191(3), 190 and 62 of Bharatiya hita, 2023 was registered at Police Station Khilchian, Amritsar against respondents No. 5 to 8 and some other unidentified persons. However, after conducting a thorough investigation in the matter, the allegations respondents were found to be MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.07.15 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10124 baseless and concocted. Hence, cancellation of the aforementioned FIR has been recommended by the authorities concerned and the same has been submitted before the Court concerned. The petitioner has also filed a protest petition. It is also submitted that presently, there is no threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner. 3. facts. 4. petition is disposed of. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner feels any threat to his life and liberty in future, he may approach the SHO of the local police station, who will take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law. 14.07.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 10124-2024 (O&M) baseless and concocted. Hence, cancellation of the aforementioned FIR has been recommended by the authorities concerned and the same has been submitted before the Court concerned. The petitioner has also filed a protest on. It is also submitted that presently, there is no threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present is disposed of. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner feels any threat to his life and liberty in future, he may approach the SHO of the local police station, who will take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law. 14.07.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable baseless and concocted. Hence, cancellation of the aforementioned FIR has been recommended by the authorities concerned and the same has been submitted before the Court concerned. The petitioner has also filed a protest on. It is also submitted that presently, there is no threat to the life and Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present is disposed of. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner feels any threat to his life and liberty in future, he may approach the SHO of the local police station, who will take appropriate action in the matter in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- baseless and concocted. Hence, cancellation of the aforementioned FIR has been recommended by the authorities concerned and the same has been submitted before the Court concerned. The petitioner has also filed a protest on. It is also submitted that presently, there is no threat to the life and Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present is disposed of. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner feels any threat to his life and liberty in future, he may approach the SHO of the local police station, who will take appropriate action in the matter in MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.07.15 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document