Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14312 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioner has assailed the
order passed by disciplinary authority dated 19.07.2025 terminating his services.
3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel Sri Rahul Malviya, as to the maintainability of this petition at this stage for reason that the petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy of statutory appeal under the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1999.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the above.
5. In the circumstances, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter at this stage, I still provide that in the event petitioner prefers statutory appeal within four weeks from today, the same shall stand
disposed of by the appellate authority by reasoned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Tripathi, Raghwendra Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt Priynka Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
and speaking order within a further period of two months.
6. Subject to the aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 22, 2025 Deepika WRIA No. 14312 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad