Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9786 (UTT)

ADITYA GUPTA v. MS DMR DEVELOPERS

WPMS/2338/2025 · 2025-08-07

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6935 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2338/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Rishab Ranghar, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. In a suit for cancellation of sale deed filed by respondent No. 2, 3 & 4, petitioner filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint. The said application was allowed. 3. Plaintiffs filed appeal against the order rejecting their plaint. In that appeal, Respondent No. 1 moved application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for his impleadment. Petitioner has approached this Court for quashing that application filed by Respondent No. 1. 4. The writ petition is without any cause of action as no order is passed by the Appellate Court on the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. 5. Thus, there is no scope for interference in the matter. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file objection before the Court concerned. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 07.08.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.08.07 20:29:20 +05'30' 2025:UHC:6935