HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7665 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard counsel for the applicants, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 231 of 2024, under Sections-352, 109 B.N.S., Police Station -Ganj, District-Rampur, during the pendency of trial. 4. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, the applicants along with named co-accused Bhura are alleged to have caused injury to the brother of the informant. As per the medical report and supplementary medical report, the injuries sustained by the injured Haneef were simple in nature. It is contended that the nature of injuries shows that there was no intent to murder. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicants with the offence. Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicants had cooperated in the investigation. The applicants have been summoned by the concerned Court. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the said liberty. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Maseet And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants, and the fact that as per the medical report and supplementary medical report, the injuries sustained by the injured Haneef were simple in nature; at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicants with the offence; investigation has been completed; charge sheet has been filed; the applicants had cooperated in the investigation; the applicants have been summoned by the concerned court, no custodial interrogation is required; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled for anticipatory bail. 7. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicants Maseet and Ayyub @ Chota, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall make themselves available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passports, the same shall be deposited by them before the concerned court. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 9. The application stands disposed of. September 24, 2025 Manish Kr NABAIL No. 7665 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad