Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97856 (MAD)

J. GAYATHRI v. J. RAJESH

TR CMP/1169/2024 · 2025-01-24

V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tr.C.M.P.No.1169 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.01.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Tr.C.M.P.No.1169 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.25628 of 2024 J.Gayathri .. Petitioner Vs. J.Rajesh .. Respondent Prayer: This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to withdraw the divorce petition in H.M.O.P.No.2842 of 2024 pending on the file of the V Additional Family Court, Chennai and to transfer the same to the Subordinate Court, Ponneri. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mukesh Kannah For Respondent : Mr.N.Kamaraj O R D E R This transfer petition is at the instance of the wife. She seeks withdrawal of H.M.O.P.No.2842 of 2024 from the file of the V Additional Family Court, Chennai, and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Ponneri. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.1169 of 2024 2.I heard both sides. I have gone through the affidavit. 3.The petitioner married the respondent on 29.06.2014. From the wedlock, they were blessed with a child. Due to disputes and differences, the parties have separated. The respondent/husband initiated proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.2842 of 2024 for divorce before the V Additional Family Court, Chennai. Pleading that the wife is residing in Thiruvallur District and unable to travel from Thiruvallur to Chennai, she has moved this transfer petition. 4.The Parliament, while amending the Hindu Marriage Act, has incorporated Section 19(iii), permitting a wife to initiate a proceeding in a place where she is residing. This is an indication to the Court that the convenience of the wife has to be given precedence by the Court. In line with this Parliamentary amendment, this Court and the Supreme Court have consistently held in matters of transfer, the convenience of the wife should be given a superior consideration than that of the husband. As the distance between Thiruvallur and Chennai is considerable and since it will be difficult 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.1169 of 2024 for the wife to leave the child behind and travel to attend the Court, I am inclined to accept the transfer. 5.Accordingly, H.M.O.P.No.2842 of 2024 is withdrawn from the file of the V Additional Family Court, Chennai, and transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Ponneri. 6.With the above observations, the Transfer Petition is ordered. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 24.01.2025 krk Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No To 1.The V Additional Judge, V Additional Family Court, Chennai 2.The Subordinate Judge, Sub Court, Ponneri. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.1169 of 2024 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. krk Tr.C.M.P.No.1169 of 2024 24.01.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis