RAJNI WANCHOO v. UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2518/2024 · 2025-10-27
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9785 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9785 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2518/2024 CM No. 6131/2024
Rajni Wanchoo
…..Petitioner
Through: None
Vs
Union of India & Ors. .….Respondents
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (27.10.2025)
01.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the grievance of the petitioner with respect to correction of his particulars in the Aadhaar Card stands addressed. His statement is taken on record.
02. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
03. Interim direction(s), if any, stands vacated.
04. However, in case, if the petitioner would reckon that his grievance remains unredressed to whatever extent that may be, the petitioner would have the liberty of seeking Serial No. 58
2 WP(C) No. 2834/2024
a/w connected matters
revival of the writ petition by laying a motion to the said effect within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of passing of this order.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
27.10.2025
SUNIL
Whether the order is speaking ? : No
Whether the order is reportable ? : No