Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97849 (ALL)

SATYAM SINGH ALIAS MANNEY v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35352/2024 · 2025-09-18

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35352 of 2024 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudeep Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State-Respondent, Sri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned counsel for informant and perused the record. 2. This bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been moved on behalf of the accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 120 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 302 I.P.C., Police Station Vindhyachal, District Mirzapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he is not named in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number It is further submitted that there is delay in lodging the FIR without any plausible explanation. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Chandrajeet Shukla @ Golu has already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.07.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.48061 of 2023, copy of the bail order has been annexed as Annexure No.8 to the affidavit. He submits that the applicant has criminal history of two cases in paragraph No.19 to the affidavit and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Applicant is languishing in jail since 8.8.2023. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 4. Per contra learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for informant have Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudeep Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sanjay Dwivedi Satyam Singh Alias Manney .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the accused-applicant, Satyam Singh Alias Manney, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 7. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 19, 2025 Md Faisal BAIL No. 35352 of 2024 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad