Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9784 (UTT)

VIRENDRA PRASAD DANGWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/852/2025 · 2025-08-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.852 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Aswal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous, as the interim relief sought cannot be granted at this stage, the petitioner having already been arrested by the police. 4. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.08.2025 AK