Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9784 (AP)

K HARATHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5789/2025 · 2025-03-10

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5789 OF 2025 Between: 1. K Harathi, D/o. Late K.Ananda Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Reddy Nagar, Ramachandrapuram Village and Mandal, Tirupati District. 2. K. Rekha, D/o. Late K.Ananda Reddy, Aged about 42 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Reddy Nagar, Ramachandrapuram Village and Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretaryto Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Appeals, Office of the Chief Commissioner for Land Administration, APllC Buildings, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupathi District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondents in not taking steps for hearing of the revision petition filed on 13.06.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principle natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the revision petition dt. 13.06.2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the revision petition dated 13.06.2024, pending disposal of the above writ petition of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. CHENNA REDDY K Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010108412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] p MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5789/2025 Between; K Harathi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): I.Chenna Reddy.K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5789/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2""^ respondent in not taking steps for hearing of the revision petition filed on 13.06.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principle natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the revision petition dt 13 06 2024 and pass such other order. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners along with some others have filed a revision petition respondent against the order dated 31.05.2024 i nd before the 2 passed by the Commissioner of Survey Settlements & Land Records, Mangalagiri, in R.P.No.4/2018(E). The said revision nd respondent and as on date the petition is pending before the 2 matter is not taken up for hearing. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 4. Learned Government Pleader for the respondents submits that the respondent authority will consider the revision petition filed by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders, within a reasonable time. 3 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for the respondents and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to dispose of the revision petition in accordance with law, within a period of six(6) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Appeals, Office of the Chief Commissioner for Land Administration, APIIC Buildings, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Tirupathi District. 4. One CC to Sri. Chenna Reddy K Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED: 10/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5789 of 2025 X 2 8 MAR 2fl?5 . uurfcni iiectlori 1 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS