RA-CR-136 IN CR-5688 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 137 Sonu Singh Ajit Singh (now deceased) through LRs and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J 1. XLVII Rule 1 read with Section applicant/petitioner whereby CR through his LRs and others of the petitioner by the learned trial Court on petitioner was 2. impugned order dated upheld on the ground that since 05.10.2023, till the passing of the impugned order on 14.07.202 the suit of the petitioner that on the date of passing of the impugned order i.e. on 14.07.2025, the petitioner was not found to be present before the learned trial Court. 136-2025 5688-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR IN CR Date of Decision: Sonu Singh .…Applicant Versus Singh (now deceased) through LRs and others ....Non CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. HS Batth, Advocate for the review NIDHI GUPTA, J.(ORAL) By way of filing the present review XLVII Rule 1 read with Sections 114 petitioner is seeking review of CR-5688-2025, titled as ‘Sonu Singh through his LRs and others’ was dismissed, inter alia, of the petitioner was instituted on 30.06.2020; in which issues were framed by the learned trial Court on 05.10.2023; whereafter evidence of the was closed vide Court order dated Vide order dated 22.08.2025 passed by this Court, t impugned order dated 14.07.2025, closing the evidence of the petitioner was upheld on the ground that since 05.10.2023, till the passing of the impugned order on 14.07.2025, the petitioner had failed of the petitioner fell within the category of Action Plan Cases that on the date of passing of the impugned order i.e. on 14.07.2025, the petitioner was not found to be present before the learned trial Court. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-136-2025 CR-5688-2025 Date of Decision: 08.09.2025 Applicant-Petitioner Singh (now deceased) through LRs and others Non-applicant/Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. HS Batth, Advocate for the review-applicant/petitioner. By way of filing the present review application under Order 114 and 151 CPC, the review- of the order dated 22.08.2025, Sonu Singh vs. Ajit Singh (now deceased) inter alia, on the ground that suit 30.06.2020; in which issues were framed 05.10.2023; whereafter evidence of the closed vide Court order dated 14.07.2025. 22.08.2025 passed by this Court, the , closing the evidence of the petitioner was upheld on the ground that since 05.10.2023, till the passing of the impugned , the petitioner had failed to conclude the evidence; and category of Action Plan Cases; and that on the date of passing of the impugned order i.e. on 14.07.2025, the petitioner was not found to be present before the learned trial Court. under Order , Ajit Singh (now deceased) on the ground that suit 30.06.2020; in which issues were framed 05.10.2023; whereafter evidence of the he , closing the evidence of the petitioner was upheld on the ground that since 05.10.2023, till the passing of the impugned and ; and that on the date of passing of the impugned order i.e. on 14.07.2025, the RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.10 20:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RA-CR-136 IN CR-5688 3. dated 14.07.2025 (Annexure A for the review very much present before the learned trial Court on the said date signatures were borne on the attendance sheet 4. 5. the case and under the category of Action Plan Cases and admittedly, framed by the learned trial Court on 05.10.2023 and evidence of the review applicant/petitioner on 14.07.2023 the review- responsibility, deposited by the from today Legal Services Authority 44426937384, IFSC Code: SBI SAS Nagar 6. accordingly. 7. 08.09.2025 rishu 136-2025 5688-2025 -2- By producing on record a certified copy of the impugned order dated 14.07.2025 (Annexure A-3), it has been pointed out by learned counsel for the review-applicant/petitioner that the review very much present before the learned trial Court on the said date signatures were borne on the attendance sheet Heard. Keeping in view the entirety of the facts and circumstan the case and also the fact that the suit of review under the category of Action Plan Cases and admittedly, framed by the learned trial Court on 05.10.2023 and evidence of the review applicant/petitioner was not concluded till the passing of the impugned order on 14.07.2023; it is directed that one effective opportunity -applicant/petitioner to conclude his responsibility, however subject to deposit of deposited by the review-applicant/petitioner from today in the Savings Bank Account under the name “Punjab State Legal Services Authority-Disaster Relief Fund” bearing Account No. 44426937384, IFSC Code: SBIN0014656, State Bank of India, Sector SAS Nagar for 2025 flood relief in Punjab. The instant RA-CR-136-2025 accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable By producing on record a certified copy of the impugned order t has been pointed out by learned counsel that the review-applicant/petitioner was very much present before the learned trial Court on the said date as, his signatures were borne on the attendance sheet/order dated 14.07.2025. Keeping in view the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the fact that the suit of review-applicant/petitioner falls under the category of Action Plan Cases and admittedly, the issues were framed by the learned trial Court on 05.10.2023 and evidence of the review- not concluded till the passing of the impugned order one effective opportunity be granted to applicant/petitioner to conclude his entire evidence at his own subject to deposit of ₹15,000/- as costs to be applicant/petitioner within a period of 10 days in the Savings Bank Account under the name “Punjab State Disaster Relief Fund” bearing Account No. N0014656, State Bank of India, Sector-68, for 2025 flood relief in Punjab. 2025 stands disposed of, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No By producing on record a certified copy of the impugned order t has been pointed out by learned counsel applicant/petitioner was as, his ces of applicant/petitioner falls issues were not concluded till the passing of the impugned order granted to own as costs to be within a period of 10 days in the Savings Bank Account under the name “Punjab State Disaster Relief Fund” bearing Account No. 68, disposed of, RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.10 20:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.