Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97826 (ALL)

RAJKARAN SINGH SAINI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/2910/2025 · 2025-09-18

Ajay Bhanot

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2910 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions submits that the disputed parcels of land have been allocated to eligible villagers for construction of residential houses on lease. Pursuant to the aforesaid legal formalities the said allottees are in possession. Government lands have not been encroached upon illegally in this case. Shri Avinash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the aforesaid fact. Since this dispute pertains to the facts, the writ court is not the appropriate forum to agitate the instant controversy. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. September 19, 2025 Dhananjai Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushal Kishore Mani (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Rajkaran Singh Saini .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad