Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97822 (ALL)

SINTOO NISHAD v. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32617/2025 · 2025-09-23

Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32617 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents no. 2 and 3 to issue passport to the petitioner in pursuance of the application made by him in this regard. 2. Counsel for the petitioner admits that a criminal case is pending against the petitioner. 3. Sri Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 & 2 submits that the petitioner was issued a show cause notice in relation to the adverse police verification report but he has not replied to the same. 4. Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the said submission. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may respond to the show cause notice and also seek no objection from the concerned Court in terms of the judgement of this Court in Writ-C No. 41540 of 2023 (Pawan Kumar Rajbhar vs. Union of India and 2 others), if so advised and file the same before respondent no. 2, so that further action in the matter is taken in accordance with law. September 24, 2025 gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Pramod Kumar Pandey (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Sintoo Nishad .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad