IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CRWP-9583-2025 Date of decision: 03.09.2025 MUSKAAN AND ANOTHER ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Vikram Rathore, Advocate for the petitioners. Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana (Through Video Conferencing). Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate for the private respondents. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of the private respondents i.e. respondents No. 4 to 7. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the first wife of petitioner No.2-Saddam and private respondent(s) submits that there is no threat perception from Taslima i.e. first wife of the petitioner No.2-Saddam and the private respondents. VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.04 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9583-2025 -2- 2 In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) SEPTEMBER 03, 2025 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.09.04 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document