HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Through Virtual Mode) Bail App No. 174/2023 CrlM No. 1739/2023 UT of J&K …..Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs Mehraj-ud-din Mir .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (22.04.2025) 01. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner/applicant on 13.12.2024 and the same was the position on 02.04.2025. The matter was adjourned on 02.04.2025 with a rider that no further adjournment on any count whatsoever shall be granted on the date fixed and matter will be considered on its own merits. Besides, it was made clear that in case, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner/applicant, an appropriate order shall be passed. 02. Today, when the instant bail petition was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant/petitioner. Accordingly, it appears that the applicant/petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant bail petition, as such, the same is dismissed. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 22.04.2025 Bunty Serial No. 01 Bunty Kumar 2025.04.23 00:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document