JASPREET SINGH ALIAS JASSU ALIAS MANPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/49301/2025 · 2025-09-04
Aaradhna Sawhney
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97808 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97808 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-49301-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 126 CRM-M-49301-2025 Date of Decision : 04.09.2025 JASPREET SINGH ALIAS JASSU ALIAS MANPREET SINGH ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. Ankush Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG, Punjab. **** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (ORAL)
1. Petitioner, a co-accused in case FIR No. 74 dated 13.04.2022 registered against him for commission of offences punishable u/s 323, 324, 307, 148, 149 IPC (Section 341 IPC was added later on) at Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib, has prayed for quashing of order dated 31.07.2025 (Annexure P-10) passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, vide which his (petitioner’s) bail was cancelled, bail bonds/surety bonds were forfeited to the State, his presence was sought to be procured through non-bailable warrants and notice was issued to the surety.
2.
Learned counsel submits that after the registration of the aforesaid FIR, petitioner was granted the concession of bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 25.05.2023. Thereafter, petitioner was regularly appearing before trial Court on each and every date. On 31.07.2025, petitioner could not appear before the trial Court as he had noted the wrong date of hearing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner could not appear before the learned Court, on the date fixed, as he had noted that NISHA 2025.09.08 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-49301-2025 -2- the case had been adjourned to 21.08.2025, instead of 31.07.2025. The mistake occurred inadvertently and is purely unintentional. Learned counsel further submits that a lenient view in favour of the present petitioner be taken, who undertakes to appear before the trial Court on each and every date.
3. Heard. Present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the Court concerned on or before 18.09.2025. On his appearance, if he moves an application for grant of bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously by the Court concerned, preferably within a period of 02 days.
(AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE 04.09.2025 Nisha Yadav Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NISHA 2025.09.08 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document