Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97791 (ALL)

PRITHAVI PAL SINGH AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/32664/2025 · 2025-09-23

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32664 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1) a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing to the respondent no.2 i.e. (Naib Tahsildar, Madhya, Tahsil-Phulpur, District- Prayagraj) to decide the Restoration Application dated 06.07.2020 (Annexure No.5) pending in the court of Naib Tahsildar, Madhya, Tahsil-Phulpur, District- Prayagraj in Case No.574 under Section-34 L.R. Act (Rambhawan & others Vs. Basanti Devi), situated in Village-Bhopatpur, Pargana-Sikandra, Tahsil-Phulpur, District-Prayagraj and be dispose of the same within stipulated period of time as may be fix by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice." 2. It is contended that restoration application is pending in proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since 06.07.2020. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said restoration application may be decided expeditiously. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon respondent no.2 i.e. Naib Tahsildar, Madhya, Tahsil-Phulpur, District-Prayagraj to decide the restoration application dated 06.07.2020 pending in proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 24, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Prithavi Pal Singh And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad