Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9779 (KAR)

AMARESH v. SMT GIRIJABAI

CRL.P/200390/2025 · 2025-06-06

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2900 CRL.P No. 200390 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200390 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. AMARESH S/O BASAVARAJ KURADI, AGED:36 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, HATTI (GOLD MINES), TQ. LINGASUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584 115. 2. MALLIKARJUN S/O BASAVARAJ KURADI, AGED:38 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, HATTI (GOLD MINES), TQ. LINGASUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584 115. 3. KAMALABAI S/O BASAVARAJ KURADI AGED: 60 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, HATTI GOLD MINES, TQ: LINGASUR, DIST: RAICHUR-584115 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SANTOSH KUMAR B. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT GIRIJABAI W/O TABBANNAPPA TABBANNAVAR, AGED: 58 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O. KAKHANDAKI VILLAGE, TQ: VIJAYAPUR DIST: VIJAYAPURA-586113 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAVI B. PATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUMITRA SHERIGAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2900 CRL.P No. 200390 of 2025 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C.(OLD), U/S 528 OF BNSS (NEW) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 200 OF THE CR.P.C PC NO.443/2017 (C.C.NO.3934/2019) ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT VIJAYAPUR; CONSEQUENTLY, TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31-05-2019 PASSED IN PC NO.443/2017 ( C.C.NO.3934/2019) PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT VIJAYAPUR, FOR TAKING COGNIZANCE AND ISSUE OF SUMMONS TO THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498-A, 304-B, 504, 323, 354 AND 506 R/W 34 OF THE IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF THE DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT; ISSUE ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT THINKS APPROPRIATE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments at length, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. Memo reads as under: “That, the petitioner herein craves the leave of this Court to withdrawn the present petition and file discharge application before Sessions Court, in the interest of justice and equity.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2900 CRL.P No. 200390 of 2025 Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SRT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39 CT: PK