Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97758 (PNJ)

MANDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/9760/2025 · 2025-09-08

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-9760 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 MANDEEP KAUR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions to respondent No. 2. petitioners have filed a representation dated before the to the respondent No.2 abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. 9760-2025 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH MANDEEP KAUR VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.1 to 4 to respondent No.5. The learned counsel representing the petitioner petitioners have filed a representation dated the respondents No.2 and 3. The l respondent No.2 or to any superior officer abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9760-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 08.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner protect her life and liberty from sel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 22.08.2025 (Annexure P The learned counsel prays for directions or to any superior officer to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. respondents No.1 to 4 only. (O&M) .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for the submits that the (Annexure P-4) earned counsel prays for directions to decide the GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.08 18:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9760 5. disposing of the representation the respondent No.2 petition be disposed of 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to speaking order and P-5) either by himself or by some senior police officer days from that the petitioner her life and liberty, if required. It is not being made by this Court with regard to thre petitioner. The police authority of make an and take a decision Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 9760-2025 (O&M) 8587 Learned counsel for the petitioner disposing of the representation of the petitioner respondent No.2 or to any superior officer petition be disposed of accordingly. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to speaking order and decide the representation either by himself or by some senior police officer days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order that the petitioner shall be provided requisite life and liberty, if required. It is however not being made by this Court with regard to thre petitioner. The police authority of concerned an independent assessment of the and take a decision on the issue of providing Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 rned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction for of the petitioner (Annexure P-4) be given to or to any superior officer and that the instant writ Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to pass a the representation of the petitioner (Annexure either by himself or by some senior police officer within a period of 15 the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed requisite safety and security to protect however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the concerned District shall be at liberty to of the threat perception to the petitioner providing adequate security to her. :Yes/No : Yes/No submits that a direction for ) be given to the instant writ Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is pass a (Annexure within a period of 15 directed protect clarified that any observation is at perception to the ty to to the petitioner, GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.08 18:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document