JAGJIWAN KAUSHAL AND ANOTHER v. RAJAN KAUSHAL AND ANOTHER
RSA/2457/2019 · 2025-01-14
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97753 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97753 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-2457-
IN THE HIG
114
Jagjiwan Ka
Rajan Kaush
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
the plaintiffs
judgment an the judgmen ‘suit for decl
issued in the
hearing for was adjourn whereas on ordered to be 20.02.2024 gone un-repr -2019 (O&M)
-1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA
an Kaushal and another
Versus Kaushal and another
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
None.
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
After remaining unsuccessful b aintiffs, have filed the instant Regula ent and decree of Ist Appellate Cour dgment and decree of the trial Court d declaration’ filed by the plaintiff/ap
The matter pertains to the year in the same.
Perusal of order-sheets shows g for 05 times, out of which on 02 dat djourned at the request of learned as on 01.03.2024, photocopies of th d to be requisitioned; and on the remai 2024 and 08.07.2024 (last date of h represented.
D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-2457-2019 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 14.01.2025
.… Appellants
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ssful before both the Courts below, egular Second Appeal, against the Court dated 01.10.2018, affirming ourt dated 29.08.2016, whereby the tiff/appellants was dismissed. e year 2019 and notice is yet to be hows that this case was listed for dates i.e. on 16.10.2019, the case ned counsel for the appellants, of the lower Court records were remaining 03 dates i.e. 10.10.2023, e of hearing), the appellants have
low, the ing the o be for case ants, ere 023, ave RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.15 19:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
RSA-2457-
behalf of th Therefore, it are no more
non-prosecu
14.01.2025 rishu
Wheth
Wheth -2019 (O&M)
-2-
Today also, for the fourth time of the appellants, despite the case fore, it can safely be presumed that th more interested in pursuing the presen
The present Regular Second Ap rosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, a 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable
time there is no representation on e case having been called twice. that the appellants or their counsel present second appeal. nd Appeal, is hereby dismissed for any, also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No n on
nsel for RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.15 19:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.