Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9775 (ORI)

SINDHU SAGAR DANDIA v. MANAGEMENT NALCO LTD, BBSR

WP(C)/1237/2025 · 2025-01-17

S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1787 of 2025 Pradosh Kumar Sahu …. Petitioner Represented By Adv. Mr. A. K. Mohapatra -versus- Management NALCO Ltd. Represented through the Chairman, NALCO Complex, (Corporate Office)Bhubaneswar, & Others …. Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. Mr. Tanmay Mishra CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 17.01.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the NALCO-Opposite Parties. 3. It is submitted by Mr. T. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the NALCO-Opposite Parties that by virtue of notification of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pensions dated 1st of December, 2008, which was issued in exercise of power conferred by Sub- section(2) of Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, the Central Government has notified w.e.f. 15th of December, 2008 PSUs will come under the jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal. 4. In such view of the matter, the present writ application is not maintainable before this Court. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack by filing an application. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the Writ application stands disposed of. (Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge Gitanjali