Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97748 (PNJ)

SANJAY GERA v. RAHUL KAKKAR

CR/6532/2023 · 2025-07-07

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 236-A Sanjay Gera Rahul Kakkar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. that in view of order of even date passed in connected second appeal bearing RSA present revision disposed of as suc 2. aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. disposed of 4. 07.07.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6532 Date of Decision: Sanjay Gera Versus Rahul Kakkar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rahul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the in view of order of even date passed in connected second appeal bearing RSA-1124-2022, titled as ‘Sanjay Gera present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. Learned counsel for the respondent has not disputed the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6532-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rahul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. learned counsel for the petitioner submits in view of order of even date passed in connected second appeal Sanjay Gera vs. Rahul Kakkar’, the has been rendered infructuous and may be espondent has not disputed the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the present revision petition is as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No submits in view of order of even date passed in connected second appeal ’, the has been rendered infructuous and may be espondent has not disputed the In view of the above, the present revision petition is RISHU KATARIA 2025.07.10 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.