Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97730 (PNJ)

BADAM SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/26434/2025 · 2025-09-22

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CWP-26434-2025 Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 Badam Singh …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. D.R. Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Sourabh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) Again a request for adjournment has been made on the ground that additional documents required to be placed on record have not been received by the petitioner as yet, despite an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005, having been made in that regard. 2. This Court finds no ground to adjourn the matter any further as the petitioner is required to file the petition after obtaining requisite documents and appending the same with the petition. 3. In view thereof, the matter stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file it afresh on the same cause of action after documents are received. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 22.09.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.09.23 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment