HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32271 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Vimal Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer and perused the record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 213 of 2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 61(2) of BNS and Section 13(2) of U.P. Public Examination (Prevention of unfair Means) Act, Police Station Khatauli, District Muzaffar Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per prosecution story, co-accused Harendra Kumar is stated to have impersonated the applicant and had appeared in his place in the examination and was arrested at the examination centre. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. He has never authorized any person to appear on his behalf. The allegations are per se false. 6. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 08.08.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 7. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sakshi Jaiswal, Vimal Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anuj Saini .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) application. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Anuj Saini, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 19, 2025 Sumit S BAIL No. 32271 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad