Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9772 (KAR)

RAJU @ RAJSHEKHAR v. AJEET AND ORS

RSA/200432/2024 · 2025-06-30

Ravi V Hosmani

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3500 RSA No. 200432 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 200432 OF 2024 (SP) BETWEEN: RAJU @ RAJSHEKHAR S/O NAGENDRAPPA NAGANHALLI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.1-867/12, VENKATESH NAGAR, KALABURAGI – 585 102. …APPELLANT (BY SRI RAMCHANDRA K.,ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. AJEET S/O LATE ASHOK NAGANHALLI, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 2. KIRAN S/O LATE ASHOK NAGANHALLI, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 3. KUM. ANNAPURNA D/O LATE ASHOK NAGANHALLI, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: NIL, 4. SMT. ANITA W/O LATE ASHOK NAGANHALLI, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: NIL, ALL ARE R/O: H.NO. 1-867/12, VENKATESH NAGAR, KALABURAGI – 585 102. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by NIJAMUDDIN JAMKHANDI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3500 RSA No. 200432 of 2024 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KALABURAGI IN R.A.NO.27/2021 DATED 08.02.2024, AND ALSO JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AT KALABURAGI IN O.S.NO.566/2015, DATED 23.04.2021, AND FURTHER APPELLANTS HUMBLY PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO DECREE THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFFS WITH COST THROUGHOUT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation. 2. Matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for forth time. There is no compliance despite sufficient opportunity and same would indicate that appellant is not diligent in pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE NJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3