IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.387 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-710 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== Amit Kumar Son of Dev Narayan Singh @ Kallu Singh village- Bairagi Mor, Ps- Kotwali, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Dept. of Home, Old Secretariat, Patna bihar 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna bihar 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Magadh Range bihar 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya bihar 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gaya Town bihar 6. The Officer-in-Charge of Kotwali Ps, Dist- Gaya bihar 7. Pranay Kumar Sinha son of Late Hriday Kumar Sinha village- Khairat Ahmad Road, Piparpati, Ps- Kotwali, Dist- Gaya ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.P.17 Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Heard learned counsel for the State and learned Senior Counsel for the respondent no.7. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court for the following reliefs:- (i) For seeking direction upon the respondent authorities for fair and impartial investigation in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.710 of 2023, which has been instituted under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 34 of the Indian Penal Code by the Patna High Court CR. WJC No.387 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/2 petitioner. (ii) For commanding the respondent authorities to arrest the accused persons named in the F.I.R., who are evading their arrest since long time due to the collusion and connivance with the local police officials. (iii) For commanding the respondent authorities to investigate the aforesaid case properly and promptly and after completion of investigation to file charge sheet in the said case without making any unreasonable delay. (iv) For issuance of any other relief to which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. Learned Senior Counsel for the respondent no.7 has submitted that this is a malafide F.I.R. filed by the petitioner and he wants this Court to interfere in the investigation and wants the respondent no.7 to be arrested on the orders of this Court. 5. This Court in writ jurisdiction shall not interfere in the ongoing investigation. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. shikha/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T