IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 115 VINOD NATH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent No. life and liberty of the petitioner 2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to decide his representation dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P with this petition. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting upon the mer direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation of the petitioner dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P appropriate action in accordance with 6. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioner, in case, he is found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against him if there is some evidence that surfaces which he may be required by the investigating agency 04.09.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP- Date of decision: VINOD NATH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Gurjant Singh Bhullar, Advocate for the petitioner. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent No. life and liberty of the petitioner and his devotees Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a is issued to respondent No.2 to decide his representation dated .2025 (Annexure P-1). The receipt of the said representation is annexed with this petition. Notice of motion. Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation of the petitioner dated .2025 (Annexure P-1) and if any threat perception is found, to take appropriate action in accordance with law. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioner, in case, he is found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against him if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding his involvement in a cognizable offence, for which he may be required by the investigating agency ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -9625-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.09.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent No.2 to protect the and his devotees at the hands of respondent No.4. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a is issued to respondent No.2 to decide his representation dated The receipt of the said representation is annexed Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without its of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation of the petitioner dated ) and if any threat perception is found, to take It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioner, in case, he is found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against him if there is some regarding his involvement in a cognizable offence, for which he may be required by the investigating agency. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No of the 2 to protect the at the hands of respondent No.4. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a is issued to respondent No.2 to decide his representation dated The receipt of the said representation is annexed Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without its of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation of the petitioner dated ) and if any threat perception is found, to take It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioner, in case, he is found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against him if there is some regarding his involvement in a cognizable offence, for ASHOK KUMAR 2025.09.05 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document