Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97704 (ALL)

MUNSHILAL v. STATE OF U.P.

A227/11168/2025 · 2025-09-16

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11168 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a order or direction directing to the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Firozabad to decide the application 8Ga under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. in Case No. 158 of 2025 (Munshilal Vs. Stat of U.P.) expeditiously within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application (8Ga Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Firozabad to consider and decide the application (8Ga Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Munshilal .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. .....Respondent(s) twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11168 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad