Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9769 (JHR)

THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. TELCO LIMITED THROUGH ITS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY ANAND VARDHAN v. MANORAMA SHRIVASTAVA

LPA/239/2025 · 2025-08-25

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25093-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 239 of 2025 The Management of M/S. Telco Limited (Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited), now Tata Motors Ltd., through its duly constituted Attorney, Anand Vardhan, S/o Late K.P. Singh, General Manager, Legal Services, R/o Town- Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.-Telco, District-East Singhbhum ….. Appellant Versus 1. Manorma Srivastava, W/o Bhairav Nath Srivastava 2. Sri Tarkeshwar Nath, S/o Bhairav Nath Srivastava 3. Sri Tripti Nath, S/o Bhairav Nath Srivastava All are R/o Ramadhin Bagan, near Manfit, P.O.-Indranagarm, P.S.-Telco Town, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum 4. Smt. Madulika, W/o Shri Ashis Verma, R/o Flat No. 1E, Maa Tara Apartment, 246 Purulia Road, Kanta Toli, P.O. & P.S.-Lalpur, District-Ranchi ….. Respondents ----- CORAM HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellant: Ms. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents: - ----- 03/25.08.2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that she has got instruction not to press the present appeal with liberty to the appellant to avail appropriate remedy as available under law. 2. Considering the said submission of learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 3. In case, such liberty is resorted to by initiating appropriate proceedings within a period of 30 days, the period of limitation shall not come in the way of the appellant while computing the period of limitation for such proceedings in view of the fact that the matter remained pending before this Court since 24.03.2025. (TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.) Satish/Vikas/ (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)