INDU CHAUHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/2073/2025 · 2025-03-16
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9769 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37732 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2073 of 2025 Petitioner :- Indu Chauhan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar,Shree Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause of filing the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad