Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97689 (ALL)

KAMSAR RESTAURANT CAFETERIA PRIVATE LTD. AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/33413/2025 · 2025-10-06

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33413 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. There is certain discrepancy in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. 2. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. October 7, 2025 Virendra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Mishra, Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Kamsar Restaurant Cafeteria Private Ltd. And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad